I'm interested in how people's voices can come to matter in our society. I ran across an article called "The People’s Lobby: A Model for Online Activist Deliberation" written by Jeffrey C. Swift and published in the Journal of Public Deliberation. Great, let's take a look. At the top there's an abstract, a stocky paragraph of summary. I'll dive in there and get a glimpse of the heart of the piece:
Okay, I respect Mr. Swift's professional obligation to speak as one academic to another, rather than to an educated general audience--been there, done and still doing that myself when I have to. But let's see if we can grab the essence of the abstract--I'll try a translation here:
I think that's what the summary promises, but happily his blog gets more specific. If the blog didn't exist, I'd be kind of grumpy yet again about the way we academics train ourselves to keep readers and the world at arm's length with our writing style. Hurray for academics who get down to not just their own but also the people's business, who insist on writing for a smart general audience a good part of the time, as @swiftj does.